A year before I retired, I wrote Our Retirement Investment Drawdown Strategy as our plan for how we were going to manage the transition from Accumulation Phase to Drawdown Stage in retirement. That post was written on June 20, 2017.
I retired one year later.
In today’s post, a look back at how that strategy has actually worked over the past 4.5 years. Below, I’ll review each section of our original drawdown strategy as well as give our performance a grade. Just like in school, an A is excellent and an F is a failure. Fortunately, we’ve scored pretty well.
In addition, we’ll review our strategy to see what changes we should consider now that we’re 3.5 years into retirement.
- How has it worked thus far?
- What changes should we make going forward?
I enjoyed writing this post and updating the original charts from our Drawdown Strategy. I hope you enjoy reading it and trust you’ll learn some things that you can apply to your situation.How has our Drawdown Strategy actually worked in retirement? Today, a look at our original strategy and how it's actually worked out after 3.5 years of retirement. Click To Tweet
Revisiting Our Retirement Drawdown Strategy
Developing a strategy for managing your transition from “Accumulation” to “Drawdown” is critical. It’s a huge shift in your investment strategy, and it’s not something you should approach without a plan. Today, we’ll revisit our original retirement drawdown strategy and analyze how it’s worked since our retirement in 2018.
For consistency, I’ll present each of the charts from the original drawdown strategy, with updates showing our current status as of 12/31/21 for each. I’ll also summarize our original strategy, then provide an update with actions taken to date. Each of the elements will be presented in the same sequence as the original drawdown strategy, which means we’ll start with Asset Allocation.
Asset Allocation: “Increase Stock Exposure”
From the original drawdown strategy, I mentioned we were planning on increasing our stock exposure:
“When there’s a market correction, we’ll likely rebalance a bit back into equities” June 2017
We have increased our stock exposure from 48% to 57%, which is in line with what we were targeting. We took advantage of the “COVID Correction” to buy during the bear market, with our biggest move into equities coming on March 23, 2020. The S&P 500 hit 2,237 that day, which represented the low point in the market (as I write these words on 1/25/22, the S&P500 is at 4,348. In spite of the ~9% downturn YTD, I’m still up 94% from the date I made that last major purchase, confirming the value of rebalancing in a down market).
I outlined the steps we were taking in my post at the time, A Strategy For Buying Into A Bear Market, which included the following chart (red circles are dates we moved $ from cash/bonds into stocks, the % is what percentage of our Net Worth we moved. Timeframe for the chart below is Feb-Apr 2020):
In addition to growing our equities, we’ve also increased our “Alternative” asset class from 6% to 15%. This reflects our shift out of bonds and into real estate when we purchased a second home near our daughter in Alabama. Since we expect we’ll sell that home at some point in the future, we’re continuing to “count it” in our investment holdings (unlike our primary home, which is excluded).
Tax Allocation: Convert Before-Tax Into Roth
Like many Baby Boomers, we have “too much” money in our Before-Tax accounts, a legacy of the Roth not being an option in our 401(k) during many of our working years. To rectify that and minimize our chances of getting punished by the Required Minimum Distributions when we turn 72, we planned on doing annual Roth conversions from our Before-Tax accounts.
From the original strategy:
“This will provide an ideal opportunity to pull heavily from our Before-Tax funds and convert them into after-tax and/or Roth at the lowest possible tax rate.”
As I wrote in How (And Why) To Execute A Before-Tax Rollover Into A Roth, we’ve done Roth conversions every year since 2018. You can see the impact in the pie charts above, summarized below:
- Roth increased from 24% to 37% of our investment portfolio.
- Before-Tax reduced from 56% to 51%
- After-Tax reduced from 20% to 12%
In addition, “the size of the pie” has increased over the same timeframe, with our net worth increasing 45% from 2017 to 2021 (thanks, bull market), in spite of the fact that we’re no longer contributing to our investments. I suspect we’ve lost a bit of ground since 12/31/21 with the market’s current volatility, but I haven’t bothered to check. #NoWorries.
I’ve found it surprising to realize how difficult it’s been to reduce our before-tax allocation. Due to the strong market, and the fact that most of our before-tax is invested in equities, the total value of our before-tax accounts has actually increased in spite of our Roth conversions! I never expected that, and that’s the reason I’ve graded this section with a B. In essence, the growth has been bigger than the amount we’re converting to Roth.
For example, say we convert $50k in a given year, but the actual value of the before-tax investments increases by $75k. In spite of a $50k conversion, the before-tax amount actually increases by a net of $25k due to investment performance. The only reason the percentage has reduced from 56% to 51% is that the total pie is growing faster than the before-tax slice. We may have to get more aggressive on the amount we convert every year, perhaps to the top of the 24% marginal tax bracket as outlined in The New Tax Law Loophole That Benefits Retirees.
Paying those taxes requires after-tax funds, which we’re also using to live on in retirement. You’ll notice that the after-tax slice has been reduced from 20% to 12%, which makes sense given that those are the funds we’re using to pay for our retirement expenses and Roth conversion taxes. At some point in the near future, we’ll have to determine when to move to either Before-Tax or Roth withdrawals to fund a portion of our retirement expenses. I’m thankful the after-tax has proven sufficient to “cover the gap”, and I’m fine with beginning to tap into those retirement accounts when required (I’ll turn 59 1/2 this year, though I could have tapped the 401k earlier if necessary given that I retired at age 55).
Delaying The Pension
In our original strategy, I was considering delaying my pension to allow for continued growth (similar to Social Security, the payout increases if you defer). Ultimately, we decided against doing that.
Unlike Social Security, our pension payments are NOT inflation-adjusted. Once they start, they remain at a fixed payout for the balance of my life, at which point my wife will get a reduced payout for the balance of her life. Since we would have had to withdraw from our investments to fund our retirement during the delay, we decided against it. By NOT withdrawing those investments, we’ll allow them to continue to grow, which will allow longer-term inflation protection than increasing our non-inflation adjusted pension. I find that paragraph a bit confusing, but hope you understand the logic.
Bottom line: we did the math, and are convinced that our decision to NOT delay the pension was our best long-term decision to maximize the amount of money we’ll be able to spend during our retirement.
Implement The Bucket Strategy
I’ve written extensively about this one, and The Bucket Strategy Series has been my most-read series. In summary, we’ve created 3 buckets and fund our retirement spending as a “monthly paycheck” from Bucket 1, which we refill 3-4 times a year with whatever assets have best performed. It’s worked more smoothly than I envisioned, and I couldn’t be happier with the approach. If you’re interested in reading more about it, below are links to the three articles I’ve written on the strategy:
The Bucket Strategy Series:
- How To Build A Retirement Paycheck (Setting up the structure prior to retirement)
- How To Manage The Bucket Strategy (How I maintain the bucket system in retirement)
- Your Bucket Strategy Questions, Answered! (Q&A regarding management of the buckets in retirement)
A quick note, given the market’s decline YTD. As mentioned above, I strive to keep Bucket 1 “full” to provide maximum protection against a bear market. In fact, I sold several months’ worth of spending in early January to “top off” Bucket 1 as part of our Annual Financial Review. In hindsight, it was good timing, but that’s not the point. Rather, I’m simply following our pre-determined methodology for managing the buckets. At this point, we have 3 years of cash to ride out the stormy weather, and I’ve not lost any sleep over the recent market volatility. If the stock portion of our asset allocation falls below 50%, I’ll be rebalancing any funds in excess of our Bucket 1 and 2 limits from bonds into stocks. I’ll likely skip refills on Bucket 1 for a while, allowing it to draw down as intended to avoid selling any stocks during a downturn. Stay tuned…
Figure Out Health Insurance
At the time of our original drawdown strategy, we hadn’t resolved how we were going to manage health insurance during our early retirement years. We ultimately decided to use COBRA for the first 18 months, then migrated to an Aetna group plan my employer had previously established for retirees. Historically, my employer offered retiree health insurance, and the group plan was established for that purpose. My employer has discontinued that benefit, but the group plan remains available (fully paid by the retiree) and has slightly lower premiums than I was able to find through private individual plans. Given the increased ACA subsidies in 2021 and 2022, it’s possible we could have reduced our cost slightly for these two years, but we elected to remain in the group plan to ensure it was still available to us until we join Medicare in 7 years. Because of this voluntary “sub-optimization”, I’m grading this one a B-.
Longer-Term Strategy Items
Our original strategy had a bullet list of various other long-term issues we were considering. A brief update on each follows:
- Delay Social Security: I’m still planning on delaying my SS until age 70, though we may elect to have my wife start claiming at full retirement age based on my reading of Wade Pfau’s latest book. We have plenty of time before having to make any decisions on this one.
- Protect The Roth: To date, we’ve only added to our Roth through conversions from our Before-Tax accounts. When our after-tax funds are nearing depletion, we’ll evaluate the optimal mix of withdrawals from Roth vs. Before-Tax. I assume this will be driven by tax optimization, but more work is required before finalizing our decision. In general, it’s “best” to protect your Roth as long as possible, and we suspect the majority of any legacy we leave our daughter will be in the Roth account
- Life Insurance: At age 52, we purchased a $200k term policy that expires when I reach age 72 as a bit of hedge for my wife in the event I die “early”. My pension survivor benefit drops to 67% upon my death, so this was a cheap insurance hedge if that happens before I turn 72. We’ll continue to carry it until it expires in 13 years.
- HSA: We’ve contributed the max every year since retirement and spent from the account as medical bills arise. For simplicity, we use it to “pay as we go” rather than intentionally pursuing a longer-term tax strategy. We plan on continuing with this approach until we start Medicare and lose the ability to contribute to the HSA.
- Part-Time Work: We had talked about some potential short-term seasonal employment opportunities in our original strategy, but have elected not to pursue them. In reality, having 4 dogs makes a seasonal job in a National Park impractical, and we don’t need the extra money. The Board of Directors’ work was not a part of my original strategy and has been an enjoyable experience to date.
- Long Term Care: As stated earlier, we elected to self-insure against LTC risks, and continue to be comfortable with that decision.
What We’re Changing In Our Drawdown Strategy
As we approach our 4th year in retirement, we’re pleased with how well our initial drawdown strategy has worked. Going forward, the basics of the plan will remain intact. Following is a summary of how we’re approaching each of the key elements in our original plan and the minor tweaks we’ll be making:
- Asset Allocation: In the original strategy, we were planning to increase our stock exposure from the 48% allocation at the time. Mission accomplished. Going forward, we expect to maintain a stock exposure of 50 – 60%, with 20 – 30% in bonds/cash and 15% in Alternatives. We’ll watch that 50% floor given the current market downturn as a potential trigger for rebalancing, though we’ll only rebalance funds from cash/bonds to stocks in excess of our Bucket 1 and 2 limits.
- Tax Allocation: We’ll continue to make annual Roth conversions, though we’ll consider implementing them to the top of the 24% marginal tax bracket due to the reality that our before-tax accounts are still larger than we would prefer.
- Donor-Advised Funds: This is an addition to our original drawdown strategy. Before the new (favorable) tax law took effect, we pre-funded ~5 years of charitable donations into a Vanguard Charitable Fund. This fund has been drawn down, and we’ll likely look at doing another “big” funding in the next year or two to make the deduction worthwhile versus the standard deduction of $24k.
- Bucket Strategy: We’ll continue to utilize our bucket strategy, though I expect our quarterly “refilling” process will be put on hold (as designed) if the current market correction continues. It’ll be interesting to see how the strategy works in a more volatile market, but I’m convinced it’ll be the best way to manage our “retirement paycheck” regardless of market conditions
- Roth vs. Before-Tax: The biggest change from our original strategy will be to determine which funds we utilize to fund our retirement expenses once our after-tax funds are depleted. I expect we still have 3 years before we face this decision. If I had to answer this one today, I’d lean toward using the Before-Tax to fund our expenses and reduce our annual Roth conversions by a like amount. We’ll likely move toward a combination of Before-Tax withdrawals AND Roth conversions to optimize within our chosen tax bracket.
As we approach our 4th anniversary of retirement, I’m pleased to report that our original Drawdown Strategy was effective in managing our transition from the “Accumulation” phase to the “Withdrawal” phase.
Overall Score: A- (mathematically calculated from the above scores)
The primary shortfall lies in the reality that converting the Before-Tax funds into Roth is a bigger challenge than originally envisioned, especially given the strong market growth in our first 4 years of retirement. Also, each conversion triggers a tax bill, which accelerates the depletion of those valuable after-tax funds. I’m fine with that “problem” and am confident that we’ll continue to navigate the challenges of optimizing the withdrawals from our portfolio for the foreseeable future.
Going forward, our biggest challenges will be to transition from using after-tax funds to beginning to withdraw from our “tax-sheltered” accounts. It’s a reality we’ll all face, and it’s the reason we built those tax-sheltered retirement funds in the first place. As for the recent market volatility, I’m not too worried about it yet given the cushion provided by Bucket 1 and 2, but I’ll be monitoring for potential rebalancing actions if it turns into a full Bear.
Finally, health insurance continues to be a nagging (and expensive) concern. I’m looking forward to the day we’re eligible for Medicare and can put the problems of private health insurance behind us. It’s a problem we can live with until then.
Your Turn: What have been your biggest challenges as you made the transition from “Accumulation” to “Withdrawal”? Does your withdrawal strategy provide protection against the current market downturn? Let’s chat in the comments…